more about the 'head. And some other stuff because I get distracted midway.

I started writing a response to my previous post in the comments area, and realised I was, in effect, talking to myself online, which which is surely taking the narcissism of blogging to that level with which I'm not comfortable.

On the prices people are paying for the Radiohead album - I saw something in the SMH website the other day that said about 1/3 of people are paying the adminstration fee of 49p but nothing for the album, and another third at least are paying four pounds or so (about half of the price of an album downloaded from itunes). Cutting out all the middlepersons means that they are absolutely raking it in. So it will be interesting to see record companies response to bands doing this - as it seems that it is those bands that are longterm successes that finance the money that goes into supporting promotion of newer bands, and offsets the ones that don't obtain that kind of success. If bands with the stature of Radiohead, that has been built through the promotion and support of record companies, can move away from those businesses and release an album online and mean that the longterm cashcow relationship is even less certain, I wonder if the companies will change their approach to how they find new talant to promote? They seem to be fairly woeful at catching up with the changing nature of the consumption of music - their obsession with grinding out illegal distribution rather than finding out what people are prepared to pay for music online and letting market forces determine it seems wrongheaded to me.

I really like that Radiohead have found their own way of doing it too. They refuse to let their music be sold through itunes because they don't want people to be able to buy one song at a time, as they see their albums as a unified work, rather than something to pick at. And the alternative they've set up seems to work really well, particularly as you don't have to download any software, as you do with itunes, and particularly any software that then proceeds to annoy the crap out of you. (In itunes case only superseded by the monumental irritation caused by iphoto. Oh the ranting! It annoys me even more than the inappropriate use of brush script fonts, and that has been consistently annoying me since the mid-1990s. I kid you not! Although not as annoying as the Howard government, also consistently annoying since the mid-1990s.) (oh, and you should take out your frustation on that matter here.) (on reflection, that's a really dumb scale of how annoying something is - between font use and political frustrations? Like giving something a rating as somewhere between how much I would enjoy a glass of creme de menthe sitting in an airport terminal versus a fine glass of red sitting in the south of France. ) (must stop stream of consciousness parenthesizing. To coin a verb.) I like that they've stood up for their work as unified albums, and surely anyone would agree who's ever sat back after a couple of shandies and listened to one in the dark.

Regarding the contents of the album, I love it, I've become slightly obsessed. Particularly hearing Thom Yorke sing "I don't want to be your friend, I just want to be your lover" is bizarre, because it harks back to odd Spice Girls memories, that do linger long unwelcome.

My office seems to be slowly filling with moths and spiders; I think nature is trying to take back the ANU.

Or I could just shut the window.

Or even, just shut up...